Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38532658

RESUMO

Data on oral lesions of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) are conflicting, and there are few evidence-based data on oral lesions directly caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The aim of this case series and literature review is to determine the prevalence of oral lesions associated with COVID-19 in outpatients and identify oral manifestations that are likely associated with COVID-19. We present 15 patients that came for their first specialist examination to the Oral Medicine Outpatient Clinic, Dental Clinic, Split, Croatia between November 2020 and January 2024. Their medical and dental history was taken following CARE guidelines. The prevalence of oral lesions associated with SARS-CoV-2 was 1.42% during the 4-year follow-up period. The most common oral lesions were nonspecific erosions, stomatitis, salivary flow disorders (xerostomia, oligosialia), salivary gland diseases (sialadenitis, chronic sialadenitis), candidiasis, pigmentation, aphthae, burning mouth syndrome, and geographic and fissured tongue. The mean latency period was 25.1 days. The site most commonly affected was the tongue (61.5%). Oral lesions associated with COVID-19 occurred in middle-aged patients, with an equal distribution by sex. They presented in a mild form and did not correlate with the severity of the clinical picture of COVID-19.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Candidíase , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Prevalência , SARS-CoV-2 , Masculino , Feminino
2.
Dent J (Basel) ; 11(11)2023 Nov 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37999023

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the knowledge and practices of family physicians (general practitioners) and pediatricians concerning children's oral health. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This research involved a cross-sectional survey with 446 respondents, consisting of 77.8% women and 22.1% men, with 81.6% being general (family) practitioners and 18.4% pediatricians. The survey comprised five sections, gathering information on participants' sociodemographic characteristics, routine oral cavity examination in clinical practice, knowledge about dental caries and its prevention, teething symptoms, and alternatives to fluorides for preventing dental caries. RESULTS: The findings revealed an overall poor understanding of dental caries and its prevention, with an average score of 5.1 ± 1.6 out of a possible 10 points. Notably, practitioners with fewer pediatric patients during the workday, no training on oral health, and uncertainty about physicians' active role in oral health prevention exhibited lower knowledge levels (p ˂ 0.05). Over 90% of participants conducted dental and oral mucosal examinations on their patients. About 25% had received continuing education on children's oral health, and 70.6% expressed interest in further education on the subject. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights insufficient knowledge among physicians regarding dental caries and its prevention. With most participants eager to learn and actively promote children's oral health, providing training is essential to boost their knowledge and support children's oral health.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...